A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among possible neighbours about the construction of a wall in a coastal web site within a north Dublin suburb, a case which has attracted national interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of scheduling breaches, environmental issues, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has evolved into a extremely publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted under preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two residents of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore locations are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minor encroachments could have Long lasting ecological penalties, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach of their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the right posture. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their watch, an allegation that has been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In accordance with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-substantial drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely famous that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the background and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important minute in the legal timeline.
With the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely manage the wall, as created, goes outside of what was accredited and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Expert tips and authorised plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for any situation a large number of observers see as significantly widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Times article about René Collier noted that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from incredibly diverse Expert backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Periods protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-superior water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waistline-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic nature from the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with organizing permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and preparing conditions. Yet the human aspect remains central: neighbours who need to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful expenditures are paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation extend past that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Additionally, it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties including environmental protection and assets rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful concerns. Whether it is going to ultimately be altered, taken out, or done as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will probable keep on to seem in headlines, connected René Collier and Paul Feely indelibly to One of the more intently viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.